Why would a woman feel compelled to pose in her underwear four days after giving birth?

caroline berg 4 days bra and panties

By now you’ve probably seen Norweigen WAG, Caroline Berg’s, picture or “selfie” which is a picture, often sexy, that a person has taken of themselves to post to social media. What made this selfie go viral is that she posted the image just four days after giving birth. Let me start by saying that I do not intend in any way to “body shame” Ms. Berg. I feel the same way looking at her body as I do when I look at one of Oprah’s homes — it’s beauty or attractiveness doesn’t make me resent my own home or body. The question that immediately popped into my head actually wasn’t “Why not me?”. Instead it was, “What would possess a woman to do this?” The obvious answer seems to be that Caroline wants to show that she doesn’t bear any of the tell-tale signs of childbirth and this is what concerns me.

Selfie culture
Caroline Berg isn’t the first to post a provocative selfie. Thanks to social media, selfies are ubiquitous in our culture but that doesn’t mean they are healthy. According to psychologist Dr. Carole Lieberman, “[t]he rise of the selfie is a perfect metaphor for our increasingly narcissistic culture. We’re desperately crying out: Look at me!” In fact, psychologists now worry that we are seeing an unprecedented level of narcissism in the Millennial generation and what’s worse is that narcissists are the ones setting our standards. Perhaps the worst new standard that social and traditional media have set is that of the post-partum mother who, in a matter of weeks, must look as if she’s never given birth. Berg has no doubt upped the ante to a matter of days.

Where are the mandatory disclaimers?
With all this focus on women’s body after childbirth, it’s perhaps not a surprise that are seeing a rise in what is being called “pregorexia” or women develop eating disorders because they are afraid they will gain “too much” weight while they are pregnant.  As a result, many pregnant mothers don’t gain the recommended 25  to 35 lbs thus jeopardizing their babies and themselves. Even with this information, what’s amazing is that I haven’t read in the articles about this photo any disclaimers about what a woman’s body will look like days after giving birth. What I am seeing is that women who are concerned about the message this selfie sends, are being portrayed as irrational “haters”. Motherhood, especially new motherhood, is hard enough without the added pressure on women to go back to their pre-pregnancy figures within a matter of days.

Do public figures bear any responsibility for the feelings of other mothers?

kate middleton post-partum belly
Women everywhere rejoiced when Kate Middleton’s figure-hugging dress clearly showed her still present post-partum tummy. Some made it seem as if it was her duty as a public figure to show what the “fourth trimester” body looks like. I don’t agree. It is up to all journalists to include a mandatory disclaimer about what the bodies of 99.9% of us women will look like days after giving birth. Unfortunately, most people in this country are not aware of basic biology which is why many were shocked that Kate’s belly looked pregnant mere days after giving birth! As mothers, we also have a responsibility to scoff at these stories. After all, we know the story of the faked before and after pictures and we also have first-hand knowledge of how a woman’s body works.

Living in the moment
Finally, I really have to wonder about a mom whose priority a few days after giving birth, is stripping down to her skivvies for a selfie. I can’t entirely blame her, however, because we live in a culture where beauty standards are still largely defined by men so that even a new mother has to show that she is still sexy within days of giving birth. The underlying competitiveness in our selfies takes us out of the moment so we are not quite living for ourselves but for the image others have of us. Let’s hope that it’s not the same for Ms. Berg.

Why are so many kids being diagnosed with ADHD?

What do the following people have in common?

Albert Einstein
Galileo
Mozart
Leonardo da Vinci
Cher
Bruce Jenner
Charles Schwab
Henry Winkler
Danny Glover
Walt Disney
John Lennon
Greg Louganis
Winston Churchill
Henry Ford
Stephen Hawkings
Jules Verne
Alexander Graham Bell
Woodrow Wilson
Hans Christian Anderson
Nelson Rockefeller
Thomas Edison
Gen. George Patton
Agatha Christie
John F. Kennedy
Whoopi Goldberg
Rodin
Thomas Thoreau
David H. Murdock
Dustin Hoffman
Pete Rose
Russell White
Jason Kidd
Russell Varian
Robin Williams
Louis Pasteur
Werner von Braun
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Robert Kennedy
Prince Charles
Gen. Westmoreland
Eddie Rickenbacker
Gregory Boyington
Harry Belafonte
F. Scott Fitzgerald
Mariel Hemingway
Steve McQueen
George C. Scott
Tom Smothers
Suzanne Somers
Lindsay Wagner
George Bernard Shaw
Joan Rivers
Beethoven
Jim Carey
Carl Lewis
Jackie Stewart
“Magic” Johnson
John Corcoran
Sylvester Stallone

They have either been diagnosed with ADHD or based on their reported behavior, psychologists have surmised they may have had ADHD. And they are not alone. A new CDC study that’s been all over the news, found that more than 1 in 10 children in this country have been diagnosed with ADHD, an increase of 42% in just a decade! What is going on? My opinion is that our children are being forced to live in a world where their natural development does not match our current cultural expectations.

For instance, we force our children to stifle their natural inclination to move and ask them sit still for upwards of 7 1/2 hours per day. Meanwhile, the research instead shows that some children learn better when they move around. One reason is that a child’s proprioceptive system takes time to develop. This video does a great job of explaining it:

If we lived in a perfect world, our kids’ natural development would be taken into consideration and they would be allowed to fidget. They would also have shorter school days, attend schools that have a homey atmosphere, recess and lunch, and well-paid teachers. Radical? Nope, that’s how the Finns do it and they have the best education system in the world.

ADHD is just biodiversity at work
In my opinion, what sets Finland’s education system apart from the rest of the world is that they understand that children aren’t carbon copies of each other. We recognize that we have different size noses, skin color, and fat distribution but we don’t accept that we may learn differently. In a popular Youtube video posted below, Stephen Tonti at T.E.D., explains that ADHD is just a “difference in cognition, not a disorder”. The video is fascinating because it shows that we could be missing out on adding another name to the list given at the start of the post because we are so hung up on kids sitting still and doing rote work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU6o2_UFSEY

What about our kids?
Our kids are not diagnosed with ADHD as often as non-blacks and experts attribute this to a lack of access to primary care providers and other resources where they would be diagnosed. I call b.s. The low rate ADHD is one of those positive yet unintended consequences of racism. Black children are more likely to be considered criminally disruptive so instead of an ADHD diagnosis, our children are sent into the criminal justice system. The school-to-prison pipeline exists because black children who would be classified as ADHD are labeled as criminals. We see this in the “discipline gap” where black children are disciplined disproportionately more than non-blacks for similar infractions in school.

What now?
We can’t fix racism but we can stop labeling cognitive differences as disorders. We can also try to make sure our children eat a healthy diet. Anecdotal evidence points to sugar as the reason some kids find it hard to focus but research doesn’t support this assumption. Instead, it may be the preservatives that are in our foods. For this reason, the French take a holistic approach to treating ADHD and so they look at diet and home life when treating this “disorder”. I think we need to do the same in addition to giving our children the opportunity to learn the way their brains were meant to learn.

Should A Kindergarten Teacher Be Disciplined For Sending Home Letters About Her Students’ Hygiene?

Note Buffalo Sent Home Teacher Stinky Kids

A Buffalo teacher sent home the note above with her pre-kindergarten students and, as you can imagine, mayhem ensued. The Buffalo School District has filed disciplinary action against the teacher, Ms. Sharon Dunnigan, and the parents of the pre-kindergarten students have lashed out at the “offensive” note.

Generally, I am on the side of parents but I have to say I can understand where Ms. Dunnigan is coming from. Keeping our kids clean is one of the basic functions of our jobs as parents and it must be frustrating for a teacher to see children coming to school every day dirty and unkempt. Furthermore, according to the article, teachers are generally the ones who handle hygiene issues albeit with the help of a school counselor so Ms. Dunnigan wasn’t entirely out of line in sending the note.

I am also at a loss to understand the outrage at her sending notes to ALL the kids. That seems as if Ms. Dunnigan tried to be sensitive to the feelings of the children who were the true target of her note. Wouldn’t it have been worse if she had sent the note home only to a few hygiene-challenged children? By sending the note to everyone, none of the kids would be the wiser about who was actually smelly. Actually, I take that back, the parents of the hygiene-challenged children probably know exactly who they are talking about.

The thing that really gets me is the final point Ms. Dunnigan made in the note. She said that the children’s odor was making it difficult for her to do her job. It seems that the administration and parents have forgotten what that job entails — nurturing and teaching their children which requires that she be in close proximity to her students. We complain when teachers are not engaged with their charges yet here we have a teacher who wants to be engaged but can’t because her interaction with her students isn’t pleasant. Her letter may be unpleasant to read but I really think she only wanted to help and was exasperated by what she saw as parental neglect. Isn’t that what we want in a kindergarten teacher? I don’t know about you but I want a teacher who cares even if her tact leaves a lot to be desired.

Legos and robotics, and STEM. Oh my!

SEEK NBSE

Kids at the SEEK summer program work on robotics

I tend to pass on a lot of information about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs because I am concerned that black children, especially black girls, are underrepresented in the hard sciences. In fact, the situation is so dire for all Americans that President Obama has repeatedly discussed the need for more STEM teachers and U.S. trained technology workers in his State Of The Union speeches. More…….

 

Freebie Friday: Free Music Lessons For Kids(NYC)

Credit: MaltaGirl

We all know how important it is for children to learn music. It changes a child’s brain and helps them with learning other subjects besides music but lessons are expensive. Because of that, I am always on the look out for free lessons so when I heard about an amazing opportunity for our children to learn music for free in New York and I had to pass it on. Please note, however, that there is a wait-list but as my mom says, “Nothing tried, nothing gained”. Here’s more information on this wonderful organization:

:
Free Lessons for Kids?
How It Works

To succeed, every musician needs three elements: passion, hard work, and opportunity. Due to difficult circumstances, countless families are unable to afford the high cost of private music lessons which are essential for any aspiring classical musician. This project locates dedicated families with a child interested in music and offers them the opportunity to take private music lessons.

A pillar of the project is the element of service that students in turn provide to their community. By giving back in the form of recitals to social groups such as the elderly and homeless, students and their families become active owners of the project.

OMP offers students full tuition scholarships. High quality instruments are provided if needed.

There are also free music lessons online if you have a child who can learn just by watching a video. Please share any free opportunities you know of in the comments. Thanks.